Jaffna: region in Sri Lanka
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Jaffna, Sri Lanka on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Jaffna as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 4.08, which is highly disconnected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 4.67, 3.48, 4.31 and 3.94. Disconnectivity in street construction in Jaffna follows a zig-zag trend. In 1976-1990, street construction was most disconnected, while construction was most connected in 1975.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Jaffna spans a total of 2298 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed in 2001-2014. These roads have an SNDi of 3.94, which is highly disconnected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 4.67, 4.23, 4.25 and 4.08. Disconnectivity in Jaffna's street network follows a zig-zag trend. In 2001-2014, the region was most disconnected; while it was most connected in 1975.
The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Jaffna followed a zig-zag trend with an overall decrease. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Jaffna, we can consider two of its most populous cities: Jaffna and Point Pedro. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Jaffna followed a zig-zag trend with an overall decrease. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Point Pedro was at its lowest in 1991-2000.
How do development practices in Jaffna fare in comparison to others in Sri Lanka? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Jaffna was the 12th-most disconnected out of the 13 regions in Sri Lanka. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other regions in Sri Lanka, street construction in Jaffna has become more connected. Jaffna ranked 4th in 1975, 8th in 1976-1990, 8th in 1991-2000 and 12th in 2001-2014.
As of 2014, the city with the most disconnected street network in Jaffna is Jaffna with an SNDi of 4.32, which is highly disconnected. Conversely, the most connected city is Point Pedro with an SNDi of 3.85, which is highly disconnected. See trends for these cities: Point Pedro, Jaffna
The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Jaffna followed a zig-zag trend with an overall decrease. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Jaffna, we can consider two of its most populous cities: Jaffna and Point Pedro. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Jaffna fell steadily. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Point Pedro was at its lowest in 1991-2000.
To date, Jaffna is the 10th-most disconnected out of the 13 regions in Sri Lanka. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other regions in Sri Lanka, the street network in Jaffna has become more connected. Jaffna ranked 4th in 1975, 9th in 1976-1990, 9th in 1991-2000 and 10th in 2001-2014.