Kerman: region in Iran
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Kerman, Iran on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Kerman as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 2.85, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 3.8, 2.19, 2.09 and 2.62. The disconnectivity of new streets constructed in Kerman fell, then rose. In 1991-2000, new street layouts were the most connected.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Kerman spans a total of 10751 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed in 2001-2014. These roads have an SNDi of 2.62, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 3.8, 3.1, 2.94 and 2.85. Overall, the SNDi of the aggregate street network has fallen: the street network in Kerman has become more connected.
The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Kerman was at its lowest in 1991-2000. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Kerman, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Kerman, Jiroft and Sirjan. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Kerman followed a zig-zag trend with an overall decrease. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Jiroft peaked in 1991-2000. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Sirjan rose steadily.
How do development practices in Kerman fare in comparison to others in Iran? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Kerman was the 30th-most disconnected out of the 31 regions in Iran. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other regions in Iran, street construction in Kerman has become more connected. Kerman ranked 17th in 1975, 21st in 1976-1990, 30th in 1991-2000 and 30th in 2001-2014.
As of 2014, the city with the most disconnected street network in Kerman is Jiroft with an SNDi of 2.59, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness. Conversely, the most connected city is Bam with an SNDi of 0.71, which is relatively well-connected. See trends for these cities: Bam, Jiroft
The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Kerman fell steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Kerman, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Kerman, Jiroft and Sirjan. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Kerman was at its lowest in 1976-1990. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Jiroft peaked in 1991-2000. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Sirjan rose steadily.
To date, Kerman is the 23rd-most disconnected out of the 31 regions in Iran. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other regions in Iran, the street network in Kerman has become more connected. Kerman ranked 17th in 1975, 12th in 1976-1990, 14th in 1991-2000 and 23rd in 2001-2014.