Kheragarh: city in Uttar Pradesh, India
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Kheragarh, India on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Kheragarh as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 4.31, which is highly disconnected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are nan, nan, -0.64 and 1.63. Data was not available in 1975 and 1976-1990.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Kheragarh spans a total of 33 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed in 2001-2014. These roads have an SNDi of 1.63, which is relatively well-connected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are nan, nan, 9.45 and 4.31. Data was not available in 1975 and 1976-1990.
Kheragarh and Uttar Pradesh do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in Uttar Pradesh rose steadily.
How do development practices in Kheragarh fare in comparison to others in Uttar Pradesh? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Kheragarh was the 83rd-most disconnected out of the 204 cities in Uttar Pradesh. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Uttar Pradesh, street construction in Kheragarh has become more disconnected. Kheragarh ranked 100th in 1991-2000 and 83rd in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 and 1976-1990 due to unavailable data.
Kheragarh and India do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in India rose steadily.
How do development practices in Kheragarh fare in comparison to others in India? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Kheragarh was the 942nd-most disconnected out of the 1716 cities in India. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in India, street construction in Kheragarh has become more disconnected. Kheragarh ranked 1008th in 1991-2000 and 942nd in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 and 1976-1990 due to unavailable data.
Kheragarh and Uttar Pradesh do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in Uttar Pradesh rose steadily.
To date, Kheragarh is the 30th-most disconnected out of the 204 cities in Uttar Pradesh. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Uttar Pradesh, the street network in Kheragarh has become more connected. Kheragarh ranked 1st in 1991-2000 and 30th in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 and 1976-1990 due to unavailable data.
Kheragarh and India do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in India rose steadily.
To date, Kheragarh is the 236th-most disconnected out of the 1716 cities in India. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in India, the street network in Kheragarh has become more connected. Kheragarh ranked 4th in 1991-2000 and 236th in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 and 1976-1990 due to unavailable data.
As of 2015, Kheragarh had a built-up area of 0.57 square kilometers, and a population of 63245 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: