Faranah: region in Guinea
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Faranah, Guinea on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Faranah as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 4.38, which is highly disconnected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 2.54, 5.03, 4.06 and 5.53. Disconnectivity in street construction in Faranah follows a zig-zag trend. In 1975, street construction was most disconnected, while construction was most connected in 2001-2014.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Faranah spans a total of 3229 kilometers. The period with the greatest volume of street construction was 1991-2000. These roads have an SNDi of 4.06, which is highly disconnected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 2.54, 3.96, 4.04 and 4.38. Overall, the SNDi of the aggregate street network has risen: the street network in Faranah has become more disconnected. This increase has slowed: between 1975 and 1976-1990, SNDi rose by 1.42 points, but between 1991-2000 and 2001-2014, it rose by just 0.34.
The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Faranah followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Faranah, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Kissidougou, Faranah and Dinguiraye. Out of the three cities, Dinguiraye does not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Dinguiraye followed a zig-zag trend with an overall decrease.
How do development practices in Faranah fare in comparison to others in Guinea? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Faranah was the 4th-most disconnected out of the 8 regions in Guinea. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Faranah ranked 4th in 1975, 2nd in 1976-1990, 3rd in 1991-2000 and 4th in 2001-2014.
As of 2014, the city with the most disconnected street network in Faranah is Faranah with an SNDi of 3.01, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness. Conversely, the most connected city is Dinguiraye with an SNDi of -0.63, which is very well-connected. See trends for these cities: Dinguiraye, Faranah
The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Faranah rose steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Faranah, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Kissidougou, Faranah and Dinguiraye. Out of the three cities, Kissidougou and Dinguiraye do not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Kissidougou followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Dinguiraye fell steadily.
To date, Faranah is the 4th-most disconnected out of the 8 regions in Guinea. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Faranah ranked 4th in 1975, 3rd in 1976-1990, 3rd in 1991-2000 and 4th in 2001-2014.