Split: city in Splitsko-Dalmatinska, Croatia
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Split, Croatia on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Split as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 3.3, which is highly disconnected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 2.37, 5.94, 10.93 and nan. Data was not available in 2001-2014.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Split spans a total of 514 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed prior to 1975. These roads have an SNDi of 2.37, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 2.37, 3.29, 3.3 and 3.3. Overall, the SNDi of the aggregate street network has risen: the street network in Split has become more disconnected. This increase has slowed: between 1975 and 1976-1990, SNDi rose by 0.92 points, but between 1991-2000 and 2001-2014, it rose by just 0.0.
Split and Splitsko-Dalmatinska do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in Splitsko-Dalmatinska peaked in 1976-1990.
How do development practices in Split fare in comparison to others in Splitsko-Dalmatinska? out of the 1 cities in Splitsko-Dalmatinska. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Split ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990 and 1st in 1991-2000. There was no ranking in 2001-2014 due to unavailable data.
Split and Croatia do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in Croatia peaked in 1991-2000.
How do development practices in Split fare in comparison to others in Croatia? out of the 6 cities in Croatia. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Croatia, street construction in Split has become more disconnected. Split ranked 5th in 1975, 3rd in 1976-1990 and 1st in 1991-2000. There was no ranking in 2001-2014 due to unavailable data.
Split and Splitsko-Dalmatinska do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi in Split rose steadily, while the SNDi of street constructions in Splitsko-Dalmatinska peaked in 1991-2000.
To date, Split is the 1st-most disconnected out of the 1 cities in Splitsko-Dalmatinska. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Split ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990, 1st in 1991-2000 and 1st in 2001-2014.
Split and Croatia do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi in Split rose steadily, while the SNDi of street constructions in Croatia rose steadily.
To date, Split is the 4th-most disconnected out of the 6 cities in Croatia. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Croatia, the street network in Split has become more disconnected. Split ranked 5th in 1975, 4th in 1976-1990, 4th in 1991-2000 and 4th in 2001-2014.
As of 2015, Split had a built-up area of 35.22 square kilometers, and a population of 218496 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: