Comparisons

2.43.244.8<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2.43.244.8<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
CaliforniaNew YorkTexas

California vs. the other two most closely populated regions in United States: New York and Texas

California in context: Street-network sprawl of new development

The level of street-network sprawl in new development in California peaked in 1976-1990. To get a sense of how street development has changed in California, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Diego. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Los Angeles peaked in 1991-2005. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in San Francisco peaked in 1991-2005. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in San Diego peaked in 1991-2005.

California in context: Aggregate street-network sprawl

As of 2020, the city with the most disconnected street network in California is Mission Viejo with an SNDi of 5.52, which is very sprawly. Conversely, the most connected city is Woodland with an SNDi of 2.54, which is relatively well-connected. See trends for these cities: Woodland, Mission Viejo

The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in California rose steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in California, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Diego. Disconnectivity in the most populous cities in California follow the same region trend.