Comparisons

2.12.83.54.2<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2.12.83.54.2<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
GarissaNakuruMandera

Garissa vs. the other two most closely populated regions in Kenya: Nakuru and Mandera

Garissa in context: Street-network sprawl of new development

The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Garissa was at its lowest in 1991-2005. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Garissa, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Garissa, Hagadera Refugee Camp and Dadaab. Out of the three cities, Garissa and Dadaab do not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Garissa followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Dadaab rose steadily.

Garissa in context: Aggregate street-network sprawl

As of 2020, the city with the most disconnected street network in Garissa is Dadaab with an SNDi of 7.8, which is very sprawly. Conversely, the most connected city is Ifo Refugee Camp with an SNDi of 1.49, which is very well-connected. See trends for these cities: Ifo Refugee Camp, Dadaab

The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Garissa fell steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Garissa, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Garissa, Hagadera Refugee Camp and Dadaab. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Garissa rose steadily. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Hagadera Refugee Camp was at its lowest in 1991-2005. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Dadaab rose steadily.