Honghuagang in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Honghuagang in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Honghuagang plotted against Guizhou and China. While Guizhou and China both followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, Honghuagang's new street additions followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Honghuagang's incremental SNDi rose from 4.68 to 4.93 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Honghuagang ranked 33rd out of 41 cities in Guizhou and 1613th out of 1843 in China as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 4.93
- Rank in China
- 1622nd of 1843
- Rank in Guizhou
- 34th of 41
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 4.25
- Rank in China
- 1613th of 1843
- Rank in Guizhou
- 33rd of 41
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Kananga, Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Ta'izz, Yemen
- Colachel, India
- Mendoza, Argentina
- Kaifeng, China
- Omsk, Russia
In new street additions, Kananga and Mendoza both built increasingly disconnected streets over time, while Honghuagang fluctuated in street-construction patterns. For the full street network, though, all three cities follow the same trend. Notably, Honghuagang had a more sprawly network than Kananga in 1975, but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.