Comparisons

3.544.55<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
3.544.55<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
GuizhouXinjiang UygurNei Mongol

Guizhou vs. the other two most closely populated regions in China: Xinjiang Uygur and Nei Mongol

Guizhou in context: Street-network sprawl of new development

The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Guizhou peaked in 1976-1990. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Guizhou, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Guiyang, Honghuagang and Liupanshui. Out of the three cities, Honghuagang and Liupanshui do not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Honghuagang followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Liupanshui was at its lowest in 1991-2005.

Guizhou in context: Aggregate street-network sprawl

As of 2020, the city with the most disconnected street network in Guizhou is Wangjiazhai with an SNDi of 6.68, which is very sprawly. Conversely, the most connected city is Fenggang with an SNDi of 1.94, which is very well-connected. See trends for these cities: Fenggang, Wangjiazhai

The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Guizhou peaked in 1976-1990. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Guizhou, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Guiyang, Honghuagang and Liupanshui. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Guiyang peaked in 1991-2005. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Honghuagang rose steadily. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Liupanshui was at its lowest in 1991-2005.