Comparisons

3.244.85.66.4<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
3.244.85.66.4<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
GuangxiYunnanChongqing

Guangxi vs. the other two most closely populated regions in China: Yunnan and Chongqing

Guangxi in context: Street-network sprawl of new development

The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Guangxi followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Guangxi, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Nanning, Liuzhou and Guilin. Out of the three cities, Nanning and Guilin do not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Nanning peaked in 1976-1990. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Guilin peaked in 1976-1990.

Guangxi in context: Aggregate street-network sprawl

As of 2020, the city with the most disconnected street network in Guangxi is Baise with an SNDi of 5.95, which is very sprawly. Conversely, the most connected city is Zhongshan with an SNDi of 1.34, which is very well-connected. See trends for these cities: Zhongshan, Baise

The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Guangxi followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Guangxi, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Nanning, Liuzhou and Guilin. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Nanning peaked in 1976-1990. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Liuzhou rose steadily. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Guilin peaked in 1991-2005.