Arizona: region in United States
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Arizona, United States on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Arizona as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 4.04, which is highly disconnected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 3.22, 4.21, 5.55 and 4.82. Street construction in Arizona increased in disconnectivity initially but has since improved. The streets constructed in 1991-2000 were the most disconnected.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Arizona spans a total of 62638 kilometers. The period with the greatest volume of street construction was 1975. These roads have an SNDi of 3.22, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 3.22, 3.61, 3.87 and 4.04. Overall, the SNDi of the aggregate street network has risen: the street network in Arizona has become more disconnected. This increase has slowed: between 1975 and 1976-1990, SNDi rose by 0.39 points, but between 1991-2000 and 2001-2014, it rose by just 0.17.
The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Arizona peaked in 1991-2000. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Arizona, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Phoenix, Tucson and Yuma. Out of the three cities, Yuma does not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Yuma rose steadily.
How do development practices in Arizona fare in comparison to others in United States? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Arizona was the 37th-most disconnected out of the 46 regions in United States. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other regions in United States, street construction in Arizona has become more connected. Arizona ranked 17th in 1975, 26th in 1976-1990, 28th in 1991-2000 and 37th in 2001-2014.
As of 2014, the city with the most disconnected street network in Arizona is Lake Havasu City with an SNDi of 4.18, which is highly disconnected. Conversely, the most connected city is Yuma with an SNDi of 3.12, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness. See trends for these cities: Yuma, Lake Havasu City
The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Arizona rose steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Arizona, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Phoenix, Tucson and Yuma. Disconnectivity in the most populous cities in Arizona follow the same region trend.
To date, Arizona is the 21st-most disconnected out of the 46 regions in United States. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other regions in United States, the street network in Arizona has become more connected. Arizona ranked 17th in 1975, 19th in 1976-1990, 20th in 1991-2000 and 21st in 2001-2014.