Mary: city in Turkmenistan
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Mary, Turkmenistan on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Mary as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 3.75, which is highly disconnected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 3.34, 3.62, 4.67 and 4.55. Street construction in Mary increased in disconnectivity initially but has since improved. The streets constructed in 1991-2000 were the most disconnected.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Mary spans a total of 437 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed in 1976-1990. These roads have an SNDi of 3.62, which is highly disconnected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 3.34, 3.5, 3.64 and 3.75. Overall, the SNDi of the aggregate street network has risen: the street network in Mary has become more disconnected. This increase has slowed: between 1975 and 1976-1990, SNDi rose by 0.17 points, but between 1991-2000 and 2001-2014, it rose by just 0.12.
Mary and Mary follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi for both of these peaked in 1991-2000.
How do development practices in Mary fare in comparison to others in Mary? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Mary was the 1st-most disconnected out of the 1 cities in Mary. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Mary ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990, 1st in 1991-2000 and 1st in 2001-2014.
Mary and Turkmenistan do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in Mary peaked in 1991-2000, while the SNDi of street constructions in Turkmenistan rose steadily.
How do development practices in Mary fare in comparison to others in Turkmenistan? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Mary was the 1st-most disconnected out of the 10 cities in Turkmenistan. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Mary ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990, 1st in 1991-2000 and 1st in 2001-2014.
Mary and Mary follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi for both of these rose steadily.
To date, Mary is the 1st-most disconnected out of the 1 cities in Mary. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Mary ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990, 1st in 1991-2000 and 1st in 2001-2014.
Mary and Turkmenistan follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi for both of these rose steadily.
To date, Mary is the 1st-most disconnected out of the 10 cities in Turkmenistan. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Mary ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990, 1st in 1991-2000 and 1st in 2001-2014.
As of 2015, Mary had a built-up area of 32.24 square kilometers, and a population of 159946 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: