Fethiye: city in Mugla, Turkey
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Fethiye, Turkey on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Fethiye as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 0.6, which is relatively well-connected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 1.2, 0.24, 0.57 and 1.94. The disconnectivity of new streets constructed in Fethiye fell, then rose. In 1976-1990, new street layouts were the most connected.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Fethiye spans a total of 489 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed in 1976-1990. These roads have an SNDi of 0.24, which is very well-connected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 1.2, 0.45, 0.47 and 0.6. The SNDi of the aggregate street network in fell at first, but Fethiye has worsened in disconnectivity since 1990.
Fethiye and Mugla follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi for both of these was at its lowest in 1976-1990.
How do development practices in Fethiye fare in comparison to others in Mugla? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Fethiye was the 1st-most disconnected out of the 1 cities in Mugla. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Fethiye ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990, 1st in 1991-2000 and 1st in 2001-2014.
Fethiye and Turkey do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in Fethiye was at its lowest in 1976-1990, while the SNDi of street constructions in Turkey rose steadily.
How do development practices in Fethiye fare in comparison to others in Turkey? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Fethiye was the 57th-most disconnected out of the 134 cities in Turkey. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Turkey, street construction in Fethiye has become more connected. Fethiye ranked 54th in 1975, 116th in 1976-1990, 101st in 1991-2000 and 57th in 2001-2014.
Fethiye and Mugla follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi for both of these was at its lowest in 1976-1990.
To date, Fethiye is the 1st-most disconnected out of the 1 cities in Mugla. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Fethiye ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990, 1st in 1991-2000 and 1st in 2001-2014.
Fethiye and Turkey do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi in Fethiye was at its lowest in 1976-1990, while the SNDi of street constructions in Turkey rose steadily.
To date, Fethiye is the 102nd-most disconnected out of the 134 cities in Turkey. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Turkey, the street network in Fethiye has become more connected. Fethiye ranked 54th in 1975, 103rd in 1976-1990, 106th in 1991-2000 and 102nd in 2001-2014.
As of 2015, Fethiye had a built-up area of 12.87 square kilometers, and a population of 117452 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: