Ödemiş: city in Izmir, Turkey
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Ödemiş, Turkey on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Ödemiş as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 1.17, which is relatively well-connected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are -0.42, 0.75, 0.11 and 1.8. Disconnectivity in street construction in Ödemiş follows a zig-zag trend. In 1975, street construction was most disconnected, while construction was most connected in 2001-2014.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Ödemiş spans a total of 88 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed in 1976-1990. These roads have an SNDi of 0.75, which is relatively well-connected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are -0.42, 0.67, 0.66 and 1.17. Disconnectivity in Ödemiş's street network follows a zig-zag trend. In 1975, the city was most disconnected; while it was most connected in 2001-2014.
Ödemiş and Izmir do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in Ödemiş followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, while the SNDi of street constructions in Izmir rose steadily.
How do development practices in Ödemiş fare in comparison to others in Izmir? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Ödemiş was the 2nd-most disconnected out of the 2 cities in Izmir. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Ödemiş ranked 2nd in 1975, 2nd in 1976-1990, 2nd in 1991-2000 and 2nd in 2001-2014.
Ödemiş and Turkey do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in Ödemiş followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, while the SNDi of street constructions in Turkey rose steadily.
How do development practices in Ödemiş fare in comparison to others in Turkey? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Ödemiş was the 58th-most disconnected out of the 134 cities in Turkey. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Turkey, street construction in Ödemiş has become more disconnected. Ödemiş ranked 117th in 1975, 81st in 1976-1990, 117th in 1991-2000 and 58th in 2001-2014.
Ödemiş and Izmir do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi in Ödemiş followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, while the SNDi of street constructions in Izmir rose steadily.
To date, Ödemiş is the 2nd-most disconnected out of the 2 cities in Izmir. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Ödemiş ranked 2nd in 1975, 2nd in 1976-1990, 2nd in 1991-2000 and 2nd in 2001-2014.
Ödemiş and Turkey do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi in Ödemiş followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, while the SNDi of street constructions in Turkey rose steadily.
To date, Ödemiş is the 61st-most disconnected out of the 134 cities in Turkey. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Turkey, the street network in Ödemiş has become more disconnected. Ödemiş ranked 117th in 1975, 84th in 1976-1990, 90th in 1991-2000 and 61st in 2001-2014.
As of 2015, Ödemiş had a built-up area of 4.03 square kilometers, and a population of 73543 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: