Upper Nile: region in South Sudan
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Upper Nile, South Sudan on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Upper Nile as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 1.6, which is relatively well-connected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are -0.75, 0.08, 0.4 and 1.83. In each period, new street development in Upper Nile steadily grows more disconnected than in the last.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Upper Nile spans a total of 2450 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed in 2001-2014. These roads have an SNDi of 1.83, which is relatively well-connected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are -0.75, -0.03, 0.26 and 1.6. Overall, the SNDi of the aggregate street network has risen: the street network in Upper Nile has become more disconnected.
The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Upper Nile rose steadily. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Upper Nile, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Renk, Malakal and New Fangak. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Renk followed a zig-zag trend. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Malakal peaked in 1976-1990. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in New Fangak followed a zig-zag trend.
How do development practices in Upper Nile fare in comparison to others in South Sudan? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Upper Nile was the 10th-most disconnected out of the 10 regions in South Sudan. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other regions in South Sudan, street construction in Upper Nile has become more connected. Upper Nile ranked 8th in 1975, 8th in 1976-1990, 9th in 1991-2000 and 10th in 2001-2014.
As of 2014, the city with the most disconnected street network in Upper Nile is New Fangak with an SNDi of 3.2, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness. Conversely, the most connected city is Malakal with an SNDi of -0.8, which is very well-connected. See trends for these cities: Malakal, New Fangak
The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Upper Nile rose steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Upper Nile, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Renk, Malakal and New Fangak. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Renk followed a zig-zag trend. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Malakal peaked in 1976-1990. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in New Fangak followed a zig-zag trend.
To date, Upper Nile is the 9th-most disconnected out of the 10 regions in South Sudan. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other regions in South Sudan, the street network in Upper Nile has become more connected. Upper Nile ranked 8th in 1975, 8th in 1976-1990, 10th in 1991-2000 and 9th in 2001-2014.