Street-network Sprawl in Moscow, Russia

---

What is Street-network sprawl?

Street-network Sprawl is a way to measure urban sprawl, worldwide, through the connectedness of the streets. Less sprawl means more connected, more walkable streets. Well-connected streets – like New York City’s grid – are more walkable and can be served by public transit.

The street network is permanent, and its connectivity affects the livability and environmental footprint of cities for decades and centuries to come. In places with more connected streets, residents drive less and walk more. A well-connected street network is associated with better outcomes for health, the environment, sustainable consumption, social integration, and equity.

We can quantify how connected street networks are with the Street Network Disconnectedness Index (SNDi).

SNDi -- our measure of street-network sprawl (disconnectedness)

The SNDi is a comprehensive measurement of “sprawl”. It captures:

• nodal degree
• dendricity, the tree-likeness of the street network
• circuity, the ratio of the distance by road to the straight-line distance of two locations on the street network
• sinuosity, the curviness of a street

A higher SNDi means less-connected streets – i.e., more sprawl. For the 10137 cities in our dataset, the average SNDi is 2.25, with half of the cities' SNDis falling between 1.08 and 3.25.

More information on the sprawl index can be found in these research papers:

• Global trends toward urban street-network sprawl
• A global assessment of street-network sprawl

To see the state of street-network sprawl across the globe, visit the sprawlmap.

---

Moscow: city in Moscow City, Russia

What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.

View Moscow, Russia on the sprawlmap

How have Moscow's street networks changed over time?

Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Moscow as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 1.29, which is relatively well-connected.

Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 0.81, 2.36, 3.29 and 3.37. In each period, new street development in Moscow steadily grows more disconnected than in the last. This increase has slowed: between 1975 and 1976-1990, SNDi rose by 1.55 points, but between 1991-2000 and 2001-2014, it rose by just 0.08.

Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Moscow spans a total of 9926 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed prior to 1975. These roads have an SNDi of 0.81, which is relatively well-connected.

Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 0.81, 1.1, 1.18 and 1.29. Overall, the SNDi of the aggregate street network has risen: the street network in Moscow has become more disconnected. This increase has slowed: between 1975 and 1976-1990, SNDi rose by 0.29 points, but between 1991-2000 and 2001-2014, it rose by just 0.11.

Moscow in context: Street-network sprawl of new development

Moscow and Moscow City do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in Moscow rose steadily, while the SNDi of street constructions in Moscow City peaked in 1991-2000.

How do development practices in Moscow fare in comparison to others in Moscow City? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Moscow was the 1st-most disconnected out of the 1 cities in Moscow City. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Moscow ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990, 1st in 1991-2000 and 1st in 2001-2014.

Moscow and Russia follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi for both of these rose steadily.

How do development practices in Moscow fare in comparison to others in Russia? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Moscow was the 82nd-most disconnected out of the 206 cities in Russia. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Russia, street construction in Moscow has become more disconnected. Moscow ranked 162nd in 1975, 105th in 1976-1990, 85th in 1991-2000 and 82nd in 2001-2014.

Moscow in context: Aggregate street-network sprawl

Moscow and Moscow City follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi for both of these rose steadily.

To date, Moscow is the 1st-most disconnected out of the 1 cities in Moscow City. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Moscow ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990, 1st in 1991-2000 and 1st in 2001-2014.

Moscow and Russia follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi for both of these rose steadily.

To date, Moscow is the 149th-most disconnected out of the 206 cities in Russia. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Russia, the street network in Moscow has become more disconnected. Moscow ranked 162nd in 1975, 153rd in 1976-1990, 154th in 1991-2000 and 149th in 2001-2014.

What about other similarly-populated cities?

As of 2015, Moscow had a built-up area of 1218.43 square kilometers, and a population of 14077364 people.

These are some other cities with approximately the same population:

• Istanbul, Turkey
• Buenos Aires, Argentina
• Karachi, Pakistan

For some related information about population, urban extent and density, and roads, visit the Atlas of Urban Expansion.