Fateh Jang: city in Punjab, Pakistan
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Fateh Jang, Pakistan on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Fateh Jang as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is -0.8, which is very well-connected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are nan, nan, 0.03 and -1.09. Data was not available in 1975 and 1976-1990.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Fateh Jang spans a total of 23 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed prior to 1975. These roads have an SNDi of nan, which is highly disconnected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are nan, nan, 0.03 and -0.8. Data was not available in 1975 and 1976-1990.
Fateh Jang and Punjab do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in Punjab peaked in 1991-2000.
How do development practices in Fateh Jang fare in comparison to others in Punjab? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Fateh Jang was the 76th-most disconnected out of the 99 cities in Punjab. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Punjab, street construction in Fateh Jang has become more connected. Fateh Jang ranked 56th in 1991-2000 and 76th in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 and 1976-1990 due to unavailable data.
Fateh Jang and Pakistan do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in Pakistan peaked in 1991-2000.
How do development practices in Fateh Jang fare in comparison to others in Pakistan? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Fateh Jang was the 143rd-most disconnected out of the 198 cities in Pakistan. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Pakistan, street construction in Fateh Jang has become more connected. Fateh Jang ranked 96th in 1991-2000 and 143rd in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 and 1976-1990 due to unavailable data.
Fateh Jang and Punjab do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in Punjab rose steadily.
To date, Fateh Jang is the 94th-most disconnected out of the 99 cities in Punjab. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Punjab, the street network in Fateh Jang has become more connected. Fateh Jang ranked 90th in 1991-2000 and 94th in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 and 1976-1990 due to unavailable data.
Fateh Jang and Pakistan do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in Pakistan rose steadily.
To date, Fateh Jang is the 193rd-most disconnected out of the 198 cities in Pakistan. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Pakistan, the street network in Fateh Jang has become more connected. Fateh Jang ranked 177th in 1991-2000 and 193rd in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 and 1976-1990 due to unavailable data.
As of 2015, Fateh Jang had a built-up area of 1.53 square kilometers, and a population of 153965 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: