Street-network Sprawl in Pokhara, Nepal


What is Street-network sprawl?

Street-network Sprawl is a way to measure urban sprawl, worldwide, through the connectedness of the streets. Less sprawl means more connected, more walkable streets. Well-connected streets – like New York City’s grid – are more walkable and can be served by public transit.

The street network is permanent, and its connectivity affects the livability and environmental footprint of cities for decades and centuries to come. In places with more connected streets, residents drive less and walk more. A well-connected street network is associated with better outcomes for health, the environment, sustainable consumption, social integration, and equity.

We can quantify how connected street networks are with the Street Network Disconnectedness Index (SNDi).

SNDi -- our measure of street-network sprawl (disconnectedness)

The SNDi is a comprehensive measurement of “sprawl”. It captures:

A higher SNDi means less-connected streets – i.e., more sprawl. For the 10137 cities in our dataset, the average SNDi is 2.25, with half of the cities' SNDis falling between 1.08 and 3.25.

More information on the sprawl index can be found in these research papers:

To see the state of street-network sprawl across the globe, visit the sprawlmap.

Pokhara: city in West, Nepal

What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.

View Pokhara, Nepal on the sprawlmap

Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Pokhara as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 3.6, which is highly disconnected.

Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 3.64, 3.44, 2.03 and 3.74. The disconnectivity of new streets constructed in Pokhara fell, then rose. In 1991-2000, new street layouts were the most connected.

Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Pokhara spans a total of 370 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed prior to 1975. These roads have an SNDi of 3.64, which is highly disconnected.

Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 3.64, 3.6, 3.6 and 3.6. The SNDi of the aggregate street network in fell at first, but Pokhara has worsened in disconnectivity since 2000.

Pokhara and West do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in Pokhara was at its lowest in 1991-2000, while the SNDi of street constructions in West followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase.

How do development practices in Pokhara fare in comparison to others in West? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Pokhara was the 1st-most disconnected out of the 1 cities in West. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Pokhara ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990, 1st in 1991-2000 and 1st in 2001-2014.

Pokhara and Nepal do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in Pokhara was at its lowest in 1991-2000, while the SNDi of street constructions in Nepal was at its lowest in 1976-1990.

How do development practices in Pokhara fare in comparison to others in Nepal? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Pokhara was the 3rd-most disconnected out of the 12 cities in Nepal. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Pokhara ranked 3rd in 1975, 2nd in 1976-1990, 6th in 1991-2000 and 3rd in 2001-2014.

Pokhara and West do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi in Pokhara was at its lowest in 1991-2000, while the SNDi of street constructions in West rose steadily.

To date, Pokhara is the 1st-most disconnected out of the 1 cities in West. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Pokhara ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990, 1st in 1991-2000 and 1st in 2001-2014.

Pokhara and Nepal do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi in Pokhara was at its lowest in 1991-2000, while the SNDi of street constructions in Nepal rose steadily.

To date, Pokhara is the 2nd-most disconnected out of the 12 cities in Nepal. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Nepal, the street network in Pokhara has become more disconnected. Pokhara ranked 3rd in 1975, 2nd in 1976-1990, 2nd in 1991-2000 and 2nd in 2001-2014.

As of 2015, Pokhara had a built-up area of 12.66 square kilometers, and a population of 252903 people.

These are some other cities with approximately the same population:

For some related information about population, urban extent and density, and roads, visit the Atlas of Urban Expansion.