Quintana Roo: region in Mexico
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Quintana Roo, Mexico on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Quintana Roo as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 2.24, which is relatively well-connected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 0.99, 1.53, 2.15 and 3.94. In each period, new street development in Quintana Roo steadily grows more disconnected than in the last.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Quintana Roo spans a total of 7786 kilometers. The period with the greatest volume of street construction was 1976-1990. These roads have an SNDi of 1.53, which is relatively well-connected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 0.99, 1.3, 1.65 and 2.24. Overall, the SNDi of the aggregate street network has risen: the street network in Quintana Roo has become more disconnected.
The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Quintana Roo rose steadily. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Quintana Roo, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Cancún, Playa del Carmen and Chetumal. Out of the three cities, Cancún and Playa del Carmen do not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Cancún was at its lowest in 1976-1990. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Playa del Carmen was at its lowest in 1991-2000.
How do development practices in Quintana Roo fare in comparison to others in Mexico? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Quintana Roo was the 21st-most disconnected out of the 32 regions in Mexico. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Mexico, street construction in Quintana Roo has become more disconnected. Quintana Roo ranked 29th in 1975, 31st in 1976-1990, 32nd in 1991-2000 and 21st in 2001-2014.
As of 2014, the city with the most disconnected street network in Quintana Roo is Cancún with an SNDi of 2.09, which is relatively well-connected. Conversely, the most connected city is Chetumal with an SNDi of 0.37, which is very well-connected. See trends for these cities: Chetumal, Cancún
The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Quintana Roo rose steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Quintana Roo, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Cancún, Playa del Carmen and Chetumal. Out of the three cities, Cancún and Playa del Carmen do not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Cancún was at its lowest in 1976-1990. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Playa del Carmen was at its lowest in 1991-2000.
To date, Quintana Roo is the 28th-most disconnected out of the 32 regions in Mexico. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Mexico, the street network in Quintana Roo has become more disconnected. Quintana Roo ranked 29th in 1975, 30th in 1976-1990, 29th in 1991-2000 and 28th in 2001-2014.