Ayteke Bi: city in Qyzylorda, Kazakhstan
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Ayteke Bi, Kazakhstan on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Ayteke Bi as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 1.86, which is relatively well-connected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 2.64, 1.54, 2.94 and 3.22. The disconnectivity of new streets constructed in Ayteke Bi fell, then rose. In 1976-1990, new street layouts were the most connected.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Ayteke Bi spans a total of 100 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed in 1976-1990. These roads have an SNDi of 1.54, which is relatively well-connected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 2.64, 1.76, 1.78 and 1.86. The SNDi of the aggregate street network in fell at first, but Ayteke Bi has worsened in disconnectivity since 1990.
Ayteke Bi and Qyzylorda do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in Ayteke Bi was at its lowest in 1976-1990, while the SNDi of street constructions in Qyzylorda followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase.
How do development practices in Ayteke Bi fare in comparison to others in Qyzylorda? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Ayteke Bi was the 2nd-most disconnected out of the 3 cities in Qyzylorda. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Qyzylorda, street construction in Ayteke Bi has become more disconnected. Ayteke Bi ranked 3rd in 1975, 3rd in 1976-1990, 2nd in 1991-2000 and 2nd in 2001-2014.
Ayteke Bi and Kazakhstan do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in Ayteke Bi was at its lowest in 1976-1990, while the SNDi of street constructions in Kazakhstan followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase.
How do development practices in Ayteke Bi fare in comparison to others in Kazakhstan? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Ayteke Bi was the 8th-most disconnected out of the 27 cities in Kazakhstan. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Kazakhstan, street construction in Ayteke Bi has become more disconnected. Ayteke Bi ranked 9th in 1975, 19th in 1976-1990, 11th in 1991-2000 and 8th in 2001-2014.
Ayteke Bi and Qyzylorda follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi for both of these was at its lowest in 1976-1990.
To date, Ayteke Bi is the 3rd-most disconnected out of the 3 cities in Qyzylorda. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Ayteke Bi ranked 3rd in 1975, 3rd in 1976-1990, 3rd in 1991-2000 and 3rd in 2001-2014.
Ayteke Bi and Kazakhstan follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi for both of these was at its lowest in 1976-1990.
To date, Ayteke Bi is the 14th-most disconnected out of the 27 cities in Kazakhstan. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Kazakhstan, the street network in Ayteke Bi has become more connected. Ayteke Bi ranked 9th in 1975, 14th in 1976-1990, 14th in 1991-2000 and 14th in 2001-2014.
As of 2015, Ayteke Bi had a built-up area of 5.86 square kilometers, and a population of 50965 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: