Chiba: region in Japan
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Chiba, Japan on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Chiba as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 2.14, which is relatively well-connected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 1.67, 2.35, 2.96 and 2.64. Street construction in Chiba increased in disconnectivity initially but has since improved. The streets constructed in 1991-2000 were the most disconnected.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Chiba spans a total of 38471 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed in 1976-1990. These roads have an SNDi of 2.35, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 1.67, 2.08, 2.12 and 2.14. Overall, the SNDi of the aggregate street network has risen: the street network in Chiba has become more disconnected. This increase has slowed: between 1975 and 1976-1990, SNDi rose by 0.41 points, but between 1991-2000 and 2001-2014, it rose by just 0.02.
The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Chiba peaked in 1991-2000. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Chiba, we can consider two of its most populous cities: Kisarazu and Mobara. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Kisarazu followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Mobara rose steadily.
How do development practices in Chiba fare in comparison to others in Japan? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Chiba was the 27th-most disconnected out of the 44 regions in Japan. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other regions in Japan, street construction in Chiba has become more connected. Chiba ranked 15th in 1975, 19th in 1976-1990, 18th in 1991-2000 and 27th in 2001-2014.
As of 2014, the city with the most disconnected street network in Chiba is Mobara with an SNDi of 1.99, which is relatively well-connected. Conversely, the most connected city is Kisarazu with an SNDi of 1.47, which is relatively well-connected. See trends for these cities: Kisarazu, Mobara
The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Chiba rose steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Chiba, we can consider two of its most populous cities: Kisarazu and Mobara. Out of the two cities, Kisarazu does not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Kisarazu followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase.
To date, Chiba is the 11th-most disconnected out of the 44 regions in Japan. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Japan, the street network in Chiba has become more disconnected. Chiba ranked 15th in 1975, 9th in 1976-1990, 10th in 1991-2000 and 11th in 2001-2014.