Arbil: region in Iraq
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Arbil, Iraq on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Arbil as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 2.59, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 1.59, 1.34, 1.84 and 3.27. The disconnectivity of new streets constructed in Arbil fell, then rose. In 1976-1990, new street layouts were the most connected.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Arbil spans a total of 9879 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed in 2001-2014. These roads have an SNDi of 3.27, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 1.59, 1.43, 1.53 and 2.59. The SNDi of the aggregate street network in fell at first, but Arbil has worsened in disconnectivity since 1990.
The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Arbil was at its lowest in 1976-1990. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Arbil, we can consider two of its most populous cities: Erbil and Soran. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Erbil followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Soran followed a zig-zag trend.
How do development practices in Arbil fare in comparison to others in Iraq? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Arbil was the 4th-most disconnected out of the 18 regions in Iraq. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Iraq, street construction in Arbil has become more disconnected. Arbil ranked 16th in 1975, 14th in 1976-1990, 13th in 1991-2000 and 4th in 2001-2014.
As of 2014, the city with the most disconnected street network in Arbil is Soran with an SNDi of 2.61, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness. Conversely, the most connected city is Erbil with an SNDi of 1.7, which is relatively well-connected. See trends for these cities: Erbil, Soran
The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Arbil was at its lowest in 1976-1990. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Arbil, we can consider two of its most populous cities: Erbil and Soran. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Erbil rose steadily. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Soran followed a zig-zag trend.
To date, Arbil is the 5th-most disconnected out of the 18 regions in Iraq. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Iraq, the street network in Arbil has become more disconnected. Arbil ranked 16th in 1975, 14th in 1976-1990, 15th in 1991-2000 and 5th in 2001-2014.