Gilan: region in Iran
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Gilan, Iran on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Gilan as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 3.97, which is highly disconnected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 3.86, 3.77, 5.34 and 4.98. Disconnectivity in street construction in Gilan follows a zig-zag trend. In 1976-1990, street construction was most disconnected, while construction was most connected in 1991-2000.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Gilan spans a total of 10360 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed in 1976-1990. These roads have an SNDi of 3.77, which is highly disconnected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 3.86, 3.84, 3.91 and 3.97. The SNDi of the aggregate street network in fell at first, but Gilan has worsened in disconnectivity since 1990.
The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Gilan followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Gilan, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Rasht, Bandar-e Anzali and Lahijan. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Rasht peaked in 1991-2000. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Bandar-e Anzali followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Lahijan rose steadily.
How do development practices in Gilan fare in comparison to others in Iran? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Gilan was the 5th-most disconnected out of the 31 regions in Iran. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Iran, street construction in Gilan has become more disconnected. Gilan ranked 14th in 1975, 2nd in 1976-1990, 2nd in 1991-2000 and 5th in 2001-2014.
As of 2014, the city with the most disconnected street network in Gilan is Bandar-e Anzali with an SNDi of 3.85, which is highly disconnected. Conversely, the most connected city is Talesh with an SNDi of 1.7, which is relatively well-connected. See trends for these cities: Talesh, Bandar-e Anzali
The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Gilan was at its lowest in 1976-1990. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Gilan, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Rasht, Bandar-e Anzali and Lahijan. Out of the three cities, Rasht and Lahijan do not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Rasht peaked in 1991-2000. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Lahijan rose steadily.
To date, Gilan is the 5th-most disconnected out of the 31 regions in Iran. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Iran, the street network in Gilan has become more disconnected. Gilan ranked 14th in 1975, 4th in 1976-1990, 3rd in 1991-2000 and 5th in 2001-2014.