Sukorejo: city in Jawa Timur, Indonesia
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Sukorejo, Indonesia on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Sukorejo as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 4.05, which is highly disconnected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are nan, 3.94, 4.75 and 6.12. Data was not available in 1975.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Sukorejo spans a total of 121 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed prior to 1975. These roads have an SNDi of nan, which is highly disconnected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are nan, 3.94, 4.01 and 4.05. Data was not available in 1975.
Sukorejo and Jawa Timur do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in Jawa Timur rose steadily.
How do development practices in Sukorejo fare in comparison to others in Jawa Timur? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Sukorejo was the 3rd-most disconnected out of the 52 cities in Jawa Timur. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Jawa Timur, street construction in Sukorejo has become more disconnected. Sukorejo ranked 4th in 1976-1990, 9th in 1991-2000 and 3rd in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 due to unavailable data.
Sukorejo and Indonesia do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in Indonesia followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase.
How do development practices in Sukorejo fare in comparison to others in Indonesia? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Sukorejo was the 58th-most disconnected out of the 363 cities in Indonesia. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Indonesia, street construction in Sukorejo has become more disconnected. Sukorejo ranked 72nd in 1976-1990, 99th in 1991-2000 and 58th in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 due to unavailable data.
Sukorejo and Jawa Timur do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in Jawa Timur rose steadily.
To date, Sukorejo is the 6th-most disconnected out of the 52 cities in Jawa Timur. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Jawa Timur, the street network in Sukorejo has become more connected. Sukorejo ranked 4th in 1976-1990, 5th in 1991-2000 and 6th in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 due to unavailable data.
Sukorejo and Indonesia do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in Indonesia was at its lowest in 1976-1990.
To date, Sukorejo is the 120th-most disconnected out of the 363 cities in Indonesia. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Indonesia, the street network in Sukorejo has become more connected. Sukorejo ranked 104th in 1976-1990, 108th in 1991-2000 and 120th in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 due to unavailable data.
As of 2015, Sukorejo had a built-up area of 8.89 square kilometers, and a population of 94786 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: