Cikajang: city in Jawa Barat, Indonesia
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Cikajang, Indonesia on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Cikajang as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 5.85, which is highly disconnected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 11.27, 5.12, 4.65 and 6.41. The disconnectivity of new streets constructed in Cikajang fell, then rose. In 1991-2000, new street layouts were the most connected.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Cikajang spans a total of 147 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed in 2001-2014. These roads have an SNDi of 6.41, which is highly disconnected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 11.27, 5.24, 5.27 and 5.85. The SNDi of the aggregate street network in fell at first, but Cikajang has worsened in disconnectivity since 1990.
Cikajang and Jawa Barat do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in Cikajang was at its lowest in 1991-2000, while the SNDi of street constructions in Jawa Barat peaked in 1991-2000.
How do development practices in Cikajang fare in comparison to others in Jawa Barat? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Cikajang was the 6th-most disconnected out of the 38 cities in Jawa Barat. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Jawa Barat, street construction in Cikajang has become more connected. Cikajang ranked 1st in 1975, 9th in 1976-1990, 12th in 1991-2000 and 6th in 2001-2014.
Cikajang and Indonesia do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in Cikajang was at its lowest in 1991-2000, while the SNDi of street constructions in Indonesia followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase.
How do development practices in Cikajang fare in comparison to others in Indonesia? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Cikajang was the 49th-most disconnected out of the 363 cities in Indonesia. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Indonesia, street construction in Cikajang has become more connected. Cikajang ranked 2nd in 1975, 30th in 1976-1990, 106th in 1991-2000 and 49th in 2001-2014.
Cikajang and Jawa Barat do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi in Cikajang was at its lowest in 1976-1990, while the SNDi of street constructions in Jawa Barat rose steadily.
To date, Cikajang is the 5th-most disconnected out of the 38 cities in Jawa Barat. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Jawa Barat, the street network in Cikajang has become more connected. Cikajang ranked 1st in 1975, 6th in 1976-1990, 9th in 1991-2000 and 5th in 2001-2014.
Cikajang and Indonesia follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi for both of these was at its lowest in 1976-1990.
To date, Cikajang is the 23rd-most disconnected out of the 363 cities in Indonesia. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Indonesia, the street network in Cikajang has become more connected. Cikajang ranked 2nd in 1975, 32nd in 1976-1990, 35th in 1991-2000 and 23rd in 2001-2014.
As of 2015, Cikajang had a built-up area of 3.54 square kilometers, and a population of 139514 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: