Falakata: city in West Bengal, India
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Falakata, India on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Falakata as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 1.73, which is relatively well-connected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are -1.58, 2.79, nan and 1.92. Data was not available in 1991-2000.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Falakata spans a total of 35 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed in 1976-1990. These roads have an SNDi of 2.79, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are -1.58, 1.63, 1.71 and 1.73. Overall, the SNDi of the aggregate street network has risen: the street network in Falakata has become more disconnected. This increase has slowed: between 1975 and 1976-1990, SNDi rose by 3.2 points, but between 1991-2000 and 2001-2014, it rose by just 0.02.
Falakata and West Bengal do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in West Bengal rose steadily.
How do development practices in Falakata fare in comparison to others in West Bengal? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Falakata was the 25th-most disconnected out of the 80 cities in West Bengal. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in West Bengal, street construction in Falakata has become more disconnected. Falakata ranked 35th in 1975, 23rd in 1976-1990 and 25th in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1991-2000 due to unavailable data.
Falakata and India do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in India rose steadily.
How do development practices in Falakata fare in comparison to others in India? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Falakata was the 901st-most disconnected out of the 1716 cities in India. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in India, street construction in Falakata has become more disconnected. Falakata ranked 874th in 1975, 500th in 1976-1990 and 901st in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1991-2000 due to unavailable data.
Falakata and West Bengal follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi for both of these rose steadily.
To date, Falakata is the 45th-most disconnected out of the 80 cities in West Bengal. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in West Bengal, the street network in Falakata has become more connected. Falakata ranked 35th in 1975, 38th in 1976-1990, 40th in 1991-2000 and 45th in 2001-2014.
Falakata and India follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi for both of these rose steadily.
To date, Falakata is the 1094th-most disconnected out of the 1716 cities in India. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in India, the street network in Falakata has become more connected. Falakata ranked 874th in 1975, 885th in 1976-1990, 982nd in 1991-2000 and 1094th in 2001-2014.
As of 2015, Falakata had a built-up area of 2.2 square kilometers, and a population of 93404 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: