Deogarh: city in Rajasthan, India
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Deogarh, India on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Deogarh as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 1.43, which is relatively well-connected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are nan, 0.76, 1.23 and 2.72. Data was not available in 1975.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Deogarh spans a total of 36 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed in 1976-1990. These roads have an SNDi of 0.76, which is relatively well-connected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are nan, 0.7, 0.91 and 1.43. Data was not available in 1975.
Deogarh and Rajasthan do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in Rajasthan rose steadily.
How do development practices in Deogarh fare in comparison to others in Rajasthan? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Deogarh was the 36th-most disconnected out of the 135 cities in Rajasthan. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Rajasthan, street construction in Deogarh has become more disconnected. Deogarh ranked 62nd in 1976-1990, 49th in 1991-2000 and 36th in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 due to unavailable data.
Deogarh and India do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in India rose steadily.
How do development practices in Deogarh fare in comparison to others in India? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Deogarh was the 741st-most disconnected out of the 1716 cities in India. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in India, street construction in Deogarh has become more disconnected. Deogarh ranked 1008th in 1976-1990, 825th in 1991-2000 and 741st in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 due to unavailable data.
Deogarh and Rajasthan do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in Rajasthan rose steadily.
To date, Deogarh is the 67th-most disconnected out of the 135 cities in Rajasthan. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Rajasthan, the street network in Deogarh has become more disconnected. Deogarh ranked 71st in 1976-1990, 73rd in 1991-2000 and 67th in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 due to unavailable data.
Deogarh and India do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in India rose steadily.
To date, Deogarh is the 1192nd-most disconnected out of the 1716 cities in India. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in India, the street network in Deogarh has become more connected. Deogarh ranked 1147th in 1976-1990, 1207th in 1991-2000 and 1192nd in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 due to unavailable data.
As of 2015, Deogarh had a built-up area of 0.62 square kilometers, and a population of 54390 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: