Pusad: city in Maharashtra, India
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Pusad, India on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Pusad as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 1.36, which is relatively well-connected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 1.29, nan, 1.77 and -0.03. Data was not available in 1976-1990.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Pusad spans a total of 103 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed prior to 1975. These roads have an SNDi of 1.29, which is relatively well-connected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 1.29, 1.29, 1.56 and 1.36. Disconnectivity in Pusad's street network follows a zig-zag trend. In 1975, the city was most disconnected; while it was most connected in 1991-2000.
Pusad and Maharashtra do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in Maharashtra rose steadily.
How do development practices in Pusad fare in comparison to others in Maharashtra? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Pusad was the 131st-most disconnected out of the 186 cities in Maharashtra. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Maharashtra, street construction in Pusad has become more connected. Pusad ranked 58th in 1975, 83rd in 1991-2000 and 131st in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1976-1990 due to unavailable data.
Pusad and India do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in India rose steadily.
How do development practices in Pusad fare in comparison to others in India? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Pusad was the 1151st-most disconnected out of the 1716 cities in India. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in India, street construction in Pusad has become more connected. Pusad ranked 599th in 1975, 759th in 1991-2000 and 1151st in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1976-1990 due to unavailable data.
Pusad and Maharashtra do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi in Pusad followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, while the SNDi of street constructions in Maharashtra rose steadily.
To date, Pusad is the 124th-most disconnected out of the 186 cities in Maharashtra. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Maharashtra, the street network in Pusad has become more connected. Pusad ranked 58th in 1975, 99th in 1976-1990, 105th in 1991-2000 and 124th in 2001-2014.
Pusad and India do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi in Pusad followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, while the SNDi of street constructions in India rose steadily.
To date, Pusad is the 1212th-most disconnected out of the 1716 cities in India. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in India, the street network in Pusad has become more connected. Pusad ranked 599th in 1975, 991st in 1976-1990, 1021st in 1991-2000 and 1212th in 2001-2014.
As of 2015, Pusad had a built-up area of 3.79 square kilometers, and a population of 266850 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: