Mandya: city in Karnataka, India
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Mandya, India on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Mandya as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 1.99, which is relatively well-connected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 2.12, 1.79, 3.43 and 4.66. The disconnectivity of new streets constructed in Mandya fell, then rose. In 1976-1990, new street layouts were the most connected.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Mandya spans a total of 257 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed in 1976-1990. These roads have an SNDi of 1.79, which is relatively well-connected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 2.12, 1.8, 1.92 and 1.99. The SNDi of the aggregate street network in fell at first, but Mandya has worsened in disconnectivity since 1990.
Mandya and Karnataka do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in Mandya was at its lowest in 1976-1990, while the SNDi of street constructions in Karnataka rose steadily.
How do development practices in Mandya fare in comparison to others in Karnataka? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Mandya was the 22nd-most disconnected out of the 147 cities in Karnataka. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Karnataka, street construction in Mandya has become more disconnected. Mandya ranked 42nd in 1975, 61st in 1976-1990, 38th in 1991-2000 and 22nd in 2001-2014.
Mandya and India do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in Mandya was at its lowest in 1976-1990, while the SNDi of street constructions in India rose steadily.
How do development practices in Mandya fare in comparison to others in India? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Mandya was the 309th-most disconnected out of the 1716 cities in India. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in India, street construction in Mandya has become more disconnected. Mandya ranked 459th in 1975, 774th in 1976-1990, 453rd in 1991-2000 and 309th in 2001-2014.
Mandya and Karnataka do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi in Mandya was at its lowest in 1976-1990, while the SNDi of street constructions in Karnataka rose steadily.
To date, Mandya is the 79th-most disconnected out of the 147 cities in Karnataka. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Karnataka, the street network in Mandya has become more connected. Mandya ranked 42nd in 1975, 64th in 1976-1990, 69th in 1991-2000 and 79th in 2001-2014.
Mandya and India do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi in Mandya was at its lowest in 1976-1990, while the SNDi of street constructions in India rose steadily.
To date, Mandya is the 1027th-most disconnected out of the 1716 cities in India. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in India, the street network in Mandya has become more connected. Mandya ranked 459th in 1975, 832nd in 1976-1990, 910th in 1991-2000 and 1027th in 2001-2014.
As of 2015, Mandya had a built-up area of 4.48 square kilometers, and a population of 364053 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: