Mandi Dabwali: city in Haryana, India
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Mandi Dabwali, India on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Mandi Dabwali as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 2.99, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 2.84, 2.23, nan and 3.68. Data was not available in 1991-2000.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Mandi Dabwali spans a total of 49 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed in 1976-1990. These roads have an SNDi of 2.23, which is relatively well-connected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 2.84, 2.4, 2.4 and 2.99. The SNDi of the aggregate street network in fell at first, but Mandi Dabwali has worsened in disconnectivity since 1990.
Mandi Dabwali and Haryana do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in Haryana rose steadily.
How do development practices in Mandi Dabwali fare in comparison to others in Haryana? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Mandi Dabwali was the 10th-most disconnected out of the 36 cities in Haryana. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Haryana, street construction in Mandi Dabwali has become more connected. Mandi Dabwali ranked 11th in 1975, 20th in 1976-1990 and 10th in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1991-2000 due to unavailable data.
Mandi Dabwali and India do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in India rose steadily.
How do development practices in Mandi Dabwali fare in comparison to others in India? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Mandi Dabwali was the 510th-most disconnected out of the 1716 cities in India. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in India, street construction in Mandi Dabwali has become more connected. Mandi Dabwali ranked 331st in 1975, 666th in 1976-1990 and 510th in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1991-2000 due to unavailable data.
Mandi Dabwali and Haryana do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi in Mandi Dabwali was at its lowest in 1976-1990, while the SNDi of street constructions in Haryana rose steadily.
To date, Mandi Dabwali is the 11th-most disconnected out of the 36 cities in Haryana. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Mandi Dabwali ranked 11th in 1975, 16th in 1976-1990, 19th in 1991-2000 and 11th in 2001-2014.
Mandi Dabwali and India do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi in Mandi Dabwali was at its lowest in 1976-1990, while the SNDi of street constructions in India rose steadily.
To date, Mandi Dabwali is the 638th-most disconnected out of the 1716 cities in India. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in India, the street network in Mandi Dabwali has become more connected. Mandi Dabwali ranked 331st in 1975, 641st in 1976-1990, 756th in 1991-2000 and 638th in 2001-2014.
As of 2015, Mandi Dabwali had a built-up area of 4.17 square kilometers, and a population of 69629 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: