Kanker: city in Chhattisgarh, India
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Kanker, India on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Kanker as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 3.06, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are nan, 2.95, nan and 2.95. Data was not available in 1975 and 1991-2000.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Kanker spans a total of 71 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed prior to 1975. These roads have an SNDi of nan, which is highly disconnected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are nan, 2.95, 3.28 and 3.06. Data was not available in 1975.
Kanker and Chhattisgarh do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in Chhattisgarh peaked in 1991-2000.
How do development practices in Kanker fare in comparison to others in Chhattisgarh? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Kanker was the 12th-most disconnected out of the 22 cities in Chhattisgarh. Kanker ranked 8th in 1976-1990 and 12th in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 and 1991-2000 due to unavailable data.
Kanker and India do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in India rose steadily.
How do development practices in Kanker fare in comparison to others in India? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Kanker was the 688th-most disconnected out of the 1716 cities in India. Kanker ranked 463rd in 1976-1990 and 688th in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 and 1991-2000 due to unavailable data.
Kanker and Chhattisgarh do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in Chhattisgarh rose steadily.
To date, Kanker is the 11th-most disconnected out of the 22 cities in Chhattisgarh. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Chhattisgarh, the street network in Kanker has become more connected. Kanker ranked 9th in 1976-1990, 7th in 1991-2000 and 11th in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 due to unavailable data.
Kanker and India do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. There was not enough data from the city, while the SNDi of street constructions in India rose steadily.
To date, Kanker is the 622nd-most disconnected out of the 1716 cities in India. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in India, the street network in Kanker has become more connected. Kanker ranked 462nd in 1976-1990, 446th in 1991-2000 and 622nd in 2001-2014. There was no ranking in 1975 due to unavailable data.
As of 2015, Kanker had a built-up area of 1.06 square kilometers, and a population of 88491 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: