Székesfehérvár: city in Fejér, Hungary
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Székesfehérvár, Hungary on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Székesfehérvár as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 1.39, which is relatively well-connected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 0.94, 2.61, 2.27 and 3.67. Disconnectivity in street construction in Székesfehérvár follows a zig-zag trend. In 1975, street construction was most disconnected, while construction was most connected in 2001-2014.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Székesfehérvár spans a total of 247 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed prior to 1975. These roads have an SNDi of 0.94, which is relatively well-connected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 0.94, 1.32, 1.35 and 1.39. Overall, the SNDi of the aggregate street network has risen: the street network in Székesfehérvár has become more disconnected. This increase has slowed: between 1975 and 1976-1990, SNDi rose by 0.37 points, but between 1991-2000 and 2001-2014, it rose by just 0.04.
Székesfehérvár and Fejér do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in Székesfehérvár followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, while the SNDi of street constructions in Fejér peaked in 1991-2000.
How do development practices in Székesfehérvár fare in comparison to others in Fejér? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Székesfehérvár was the 1st-most disconnected out of the 1 cities in Fejér. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Székesfehérvár ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990, 1st in 1991-2000 and 1st in 2001-2014.
Székesfehérvár and Hungary do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in Székesfehérvár followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, while the SNDi of street constructions in Hungary rose steadily.
How do development practices in Székesfehérvár fare in comparison to others in Hungary? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Székesfehérvár was the 4th-most disconnected out of the 11 cities in Hungary. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Hungary, street construction in Székesfehérvár has become more disconnected. Székesfehérvár ranked 7th in 1975, 6th in 1976-1990, 4th in 1991-2000 and 4th in 2001-2014.
Székesfehérvár and Fejér follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi for both of these rose steadily.
To date, Székesfehérvár is the 1st-most disconnected out of the 1 cities in Fejér. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Székesfehérvár ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990, 1st in 1991-2000 and 1st in 2001-2014.
Székesfehérvár and Hungary follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi for both of these rose steadily.
To date, Székesfehérvár is the 6th-most disconnected out of the 11 cities in Hungary. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Hungary, the street network in Székesfehérvár has become more disconnected. Székesfehérvár ranked 7th in 1975, 6th in 1976-1990, 5th in 1991-2000 and 6th in 2001-2014.
As of 2015, Székesfehérvár had a built-up area of 18.89 square kilometers, and a population of 67099 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: