Southern Finland: region in Finland
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Southern Finland, Finland on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Southern Finland as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 2.74, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 1.56, 2.55, 3.78 and 4.59. In each period, new street development in Southern Finland steadily grows more disconnected than in the last. This increase has slowed: between 1975 and 1976-1990, SNDi rose by 0.99 points, but between 1991-2000 and 2001-2014, it rose by just 0.8.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Southern Finland spans a total of 17617 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed in 1976-1990. These roads have an SNDi of 2.55, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 1.56, 2.15, 2.36 and 2.74. Overall, the SNDi of the aggregate street network has risen: the street network in Southern Finland has become more disconnected. This increase has slowed: between 1975 and 1976-1990, SNDi rose by 0.59 points, but between 1991-2000 and 2001-2014, it rose by just 0.38.
The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Southern Finland rose steadily. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Southern Finland, we can consider one of its most populous cities: Helsinki. Disconnectivity in the most populous cities in Southern Finland follow the same region trend.
How do development practices in Southern Finland fare in comparison to others in Finland? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Southern Finland was the 2nd-most disconnected out of the 4 regions in Finland. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Finland, street construction in Southern Finland has become more disconnected. Southern Finland ranked 4th in 1975, 4th in 1976-1990, 2nd in 1991-2000 and 2nd in 2001-2014.
As of 2014, the city with the most disconnected street network in Southern Finland is Helsinki with an SNDi of 0.81, which is relatively well-connected. Conversely, the most connected city is Helsinki with an SNDi of 0.81, which is relatively well-connected. See trends for these cities: Helsinki, Helsinki
The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Southern Finland rose steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Southern Finland, we can consider one of its most populous cities: Helsinki. Disconnectivity in the most populous cities in Southern Finland follow the same region trend.
To date, Southern Finland is the 3rd-most disconnected out of the 4 regions in Finland. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Finland, the street network in Southern Finland has become more disconnected. Southern Finland ranked 4th in 1975, 4th in 1976-1990, 4th in 1991-2000 and 3rd in 2001-2014.