Ciego de Ávila: city in Cuba
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Ciego de Ávila, Cuba on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Ciego de Ávila as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 0.7, which is relatively well-connected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 0.46, 0.96, 0.63 and 2.77. Disconnectivity in street construction in Ciego de Ávila follows a zig-zag trend. In 1975, street construction was most disconnected, while construction was most connected in 2001-2014.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Ciego de Ávila spans a total of 229 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed prior to 1975. These roads have an SNDi of 0.46, which is relatively well-connected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 0.46, 0.68, 0.66 and 0.7. Disconnectivity in Ciego de Ávila's street network follows a zig-zag trend. In 1975, the city was most disconnected; while it was most connected in 2001-2014.
Ciego de Ávila and Ciego de Ávila follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi for both of these followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase.
How do development practices in Ciego de Ávila fare in comparison to others in Ciego de Ávila? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Ciego de Ávila was the 1st-most disconnected out of the 1 cities in Ciego de Ávila. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Ciego de Ávila ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990, 1st in 1991-2000 and 1st in 2001-2014.
Ciego de Ávila and Cuba do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in Ciego de Ávila followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, while the SNDi of street constructions in Cuba rose steadily.
How do development practices in Ciego de Ávila fare in comparison to others in Cuba? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Ciego de Ávila was the 12th-most disconnected out of the 19 cities in Cuba. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Cuba, street construction in Ciego de Ávila has become more disconnected. Ciego de Ávila ranked 13th in 1975, 18th in 1976-1990, 17th in 1991-2000 and 12th in 2001-2014.
Ciego de Ávila and Ciego de Ávila follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi for both of these followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase.
To date, Ciego de Ávila is the 1st-most disconnected out of the 1 cities in Ciego de Ávila. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Ciego de Ávila ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990, 1st in 1991-2000 and 1st in 2001-2014.
Ciego de Ávila and Cuba do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi in Ciego de Ávila followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, while the SNDi of street constructions in Cuba rose steadily.
To date, Ciego de Ávila is the 18th-most disconnected out of the 19 cities in Cuba. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Cuba, the street network in Ciego de Ávila has become more connected. Ciego de Ávila ranked 13th in 1975, 18th in 1976-1990, 18th in 1991-2000 and 18th in 2001-2014.
As of 2015, Ciego de Ávila had a built-up area of 9.35 square kilometers, and a population of 122960 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: