Zagreb: city in Grad Zagreb, Croatia
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Zagreb, Croatia on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Zagreb as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 2.98, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 2.62, 5.13, 8.26 and 6.99. Street construction in Zagreb increased in disconnectivity initially but has since improved. The streets constructed in 1991-2000 were the most disconnected.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Zagreb spans a total of 1937 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed prior to 1975. These roads have an SNDi of 2.62, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 2.62, 2.87, 2.94 and 2.98. Overall, the SNDi of the aggregate street network has risen: the street network in Zagreb has become more disconnected. This increase has slowed: between 1975 and 1976-1990, SNDi rose by 0.25 points, but between 1991-2000 and 2001-2014, it rose by just 0.03.
Zagreb and Grad Zagreb follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi for both of these peaked in 1991-2000.
How do development practices in Zagreb fare in comparison to others in Grad Zagreb? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Zagreb was the 1st-most disconnected out of the 1 cities in Grad Zagreb. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Zagreb ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990, 1st in 1991-2000 and 1st in 2001-2014.
Zagreb and Croatia follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi for both of these peaked in 1991-2000.
How do development practices in Zagreb fare in comparison to others in Croatia? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Zagreb was the 1st-most disconnected out of the 6 cities in Croatia. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Croatia, street construction in Zagreb has become more disconnected. Zagreb ranked 4th in 1975, 4th in 1976-1990, 2nd in 1991-2000 and 1st in 2001-2014.
Zagreb and Grad Zagreb follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi for both of these rose steadily.
To date, Zagreb is the 1st-most disconnected out of the 1 cities in Grad Zagreb. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Zagreb ranked 1st in 1975, 1st in 1976-1990, 1st in 1991-2000 and 1st in 2001-2014.
Zagreb and Croatia follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi for both of these rose steadily.
To date, Zagreb is the 5th-most disconnected out of the 6 cities in Croatia. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Croatia, the street network in Zagreb has become more connected. Zagreb ranked 4th in 1975, 5th in 1976-1990, 5th in 1991-2000 and 5th in 2001-2014.
As of 2015, Zagreb had a built-up area of 102.87 square kilometers, and a population of 660652 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: