Luhe: city in Jiangsu, China
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Luhe, China on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Luhe as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 2.79, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 2.59, 2.56, 3.82 and 2.98. Disconnectivity in street construction in Luhe follows a zig-zag trend. In 1976-1990, street construction was most disconnected, while construction was most connected in 1991-2000.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Luhe spans a total of 532 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed in 2001-2014. These roads have an SNDi of 2.98, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 2.59, 2.58, 2.65 and 2.79. The SNDi of the aggregate street network in fell at first, but Luhe has worsened in disconnectivity since 1990.
Luhe and Jiangsu do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in Luhe followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, while the SNDi of street constructions in Jiangsu followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase.
How do development practices in Luhe fare in comparison to others in Jiangsu? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Luhe was the 12th-most disconnected out of the 87 cities in Jiangsu. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. Luhe ranked 12th in 1975, 24th in 1976-1990, 4th in 1991-2000 and 12th in 2001-2014.
Luhe and China do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in Luhe followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, while the SNDi of street constructions in China followed a zig-zag trend with an overall decrease.
How do development practices in Luhe fare in comparison to others in China? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Luhe was the 387th-most disconnected out of the 1651 cities in China. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in China, street construction in Luhe has become more connected. Luhe ranked 332nd in 1975, 441st in 1976-1990, 134th in 1991-2000 and 387th in 2001-2014.
Luhe and Jiangsu do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi in Luhe was at its lowest in 1976-1990, while the SNDi of street constructions in Jiangsu peaked in 1976-1990.
To date, Luhe is the 13th-most disconnected out of the 87 cities in Jiangsu. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Jiangsu, the street network in Luhe has become more connected. Luhe ranked 12th in 1975, 20th in 1976-1990, 13th in 1991-2000 and 13th in 2001-2014.
Luhe and China do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi in Luhe was at its lowest in 1976-1990, while the SNDi of street constructions in China peaked in 1976-1990.
To date, Luhe is the 371st-most disconnected out of the 1651 cities in China. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in China, the street network in Luhe has become more connected. Luhe ranked 332nd in 1975, 408th in 1976-1990, 377th in 1991-2000 and 371st in 2001-2014.
As of 2015, Luhe had a built-up area of 51.3 square kilometers, and a population of 479864 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: