San Pedro: city in Jujuy, Argentina
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View San Pedro, Argentina on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in San Pedro as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 0.59, which is relatively well-connected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 0.63, 0.39, 1.13 and 0.78. Disconnectivity in street construction in San Pedro follows a zig-zag trend. In 1976-1990, street construction was most disconnected, while construction was most connected in 1991-2000.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in San Pedro spans a total of 171 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed prior to 1975. These roads have an SNDi of 0.63, which is relatively well-connected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 0.63, 0.58, 0.59 and 0.59. The SNDi of the aggregate street network in fell at first, but San Pedro has worsened in disconnectivity since 1990.
San Pedro and Jujuy do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in San Pedro followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, while the SNDi of street constructions in Jujuy was at its lowest in 1976-1990.
How do development practices in San Pedro fare in comparison to others in Jujuy? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in San Pedro was the 3rd-most disconnected out of the 3 cities in Jujuy. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has not changed. San Pedro ranked 3rd in 1975, 2nd in 1976-1990, 2nd in 1991-2000 and 3rd in 2001-2014.
San Pedro and Argentina do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their street network constructions. The SNDi in San Pedro followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, while the SNDi of street constructions in Argentina rose steadily.
How do development practices in San Pedro fare in comparison to others in Argentina? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in San Pedro was the 45th-most disconnected out of the 70 cities in Argentina. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Argentina, street construction in San Pedro has become more connected. San Pedro ranked 14th in 1975, 29th in 1976-1990, 23rd in 1991-2000 and 45th in 2001-2014.
San Pedro and Jujuy follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi for both of these was at its lowest in 1976-1990.
To date, San Pedro is the 2nd-most disconnected out of the 3 cities in Jujuy. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other cities in Jujuy, the street network in San Pedro has become more disconnected. San Pedro ranked 3rd in 1975, 2nd in 1976-1990, 2nd in 1991-2000 and 2nd in 2001-2014.
San Pedro and Argentina do not follow the same trend in the disconnectivity of their aggregate street networks. The SNDi in San Pedro was at its lowest in 1976-1990, while the SNDi of street constructions in Argentina rose steadily.
To date, San Pedro is the 18th-most disconnected out of the 70 cities in Argentina. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other cities in Argentina, the street network in San Pedro has become more connected. San Pedro ranked 14th in 1975, 16th in 1976-1990, 16th in 1991-2000 and 18th in 2001-2014.
As of 2015, San Pedro had a built-up area of 4.15 square kilometers, and a population of 55448 people.
These are some other cities with approximately the same population: