Street-network Sprawl in Buenos Aires, Argentina


What is Street-network sprawl?

Street-network Sprawl is a way to measure urban sprawl, worldwide, through the connectedness of the streets. Less sprawl means more connected, more walkable streets. Well-connected streets – like New York City’s grid – are more walkable and can be served by public transit.

The street network is permanent, and its connectivity affects the livability and environmental footprint of cities for decades and centuries to come. In places with more connected streets, residents drive less and walk more. A well-connected street network is associated with better outcomes for health, the environment, sustainable consumption, social integration, and equity.

We can quantify how connected street networks are with the Street Network Disconnectedness Index (SNDi).

SNDi -- our measure of street-network sprawl (disconnectedness)

The SNDi is a comprehensive measurement of “sprawl”. It captures:

A higher SNDi means less-connected streets – i.e., more sprawl. For the 10137 cities in our dataset, the average SNDi is 2.25, with half of the cities' SNDis falling between 1.08 and 3.25.

More information on the sprawl index can be found in these research papers:

To see the state of street-network sprawl across the globe, visit the sprawlmap.

Buenos Aires: region in Argentina

What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.

View Buenos Aires, Argentina on the sprawlmap

Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Buenos Aires as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 0.54, which is relatively well-connected.

Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 0.0, 0.58, 2.04 and 2.37. In each period, new street development in Buenos Aires steadily grows more disconnected than in the last. This increase has slowed: between 1975 and 1976-1990, SNDi rose by 0.58 points, but between 1991-2000 and 2001-2014, it rose by just 0.33.

Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Buenos Aires spans a total of 87398 kilometers. The period with the greatest volume of street construction was 1975. These roads have an SNDi of 0.0, which is very well-connected.

Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 0.0, 0.21, 0.37 and 0.54. Overall, the SNDi of the aggregate street network has risen: the street network in Buenos Aires has become more disconnected. This increase has slowed: between 1975 and 1976-1990, SNDi rose by 0.21 points, but between 1991-2000 and 2001-2014, it rose by just 0.16.

The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Buenos Aires rose steadily. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Buenos Aires, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Buenos Aires, La Plata and Mar del Plata. Out of the three cities, Buenos Aires and Mar del Plata do not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Buenos Aires peaked in 1991-2000. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Mar del Plata peaked in 1991-2000.

How do development practices in Buenos Aires fare in comparison to others in Argentina? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Buenos Aires was the 8th-most disconnected out of the 23 regions in Argentina. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Argentina, street construction in Buenos Aires has become more disconnected. Buenos Aires ranked 19th in 1975, 16th in 1976-1990, 6th in 1991-2000 and 8th in 2001-2014.

As of 2014, the city with the most disconnected street network in Buenos Aires is Pilar with an SNDi of 2.33, which is in the 40th to 60th percentile of disconnectedness. Conversely, the most connected city is Necochea with an SNDi of -0.43, which is very well-connected. See trends for these cities: Necochea, Pilar

The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Buenos Aires rose steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Buenos Aires, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Buenos Aires, La Plata and Mar del Plata. Disconnectivity in the most populous cities in Buenos Aires follow the same region trend.

To date, Buenos Aires is the 20th-most disconnected out of the 23 regions in Argentina. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other regions in Argentina, the street network in Buenos Aires has become more connected. Buenos Aires ranked 19th in 1975, 20th in 1976-1990, 20th in 1991-2000 and 20th in 2001-2014.