Laghman: region in Afghanistan
What exactly constitutes the spatial extent of the city? For these aggregations, we used the Global Human Settlement Layer Urban Center Database (GHS-UCDB) to define the boundaries of the city. These cities -- or urban centers -- cover areas that are densely populated and built-up, and so may extend beyond the spatial borders of these cities that we may be familiar with. The GHS area is shaded in blue.
View Laghman, Afghanistan on the sprawlmap
Most recent snapshot: Taking into account the entire (i.e. aggregate) street network in Laghman as of 2014, the overall level of street-network sprawl is 5.73, which is highly disconnected.
Trends in street network construction: The SNDis of street construction for the respective time periods are 6.65, 4.12, 4.46 and 6.24. The disconnectivity of new streets constructed in Laghman fell, then rose. In 1976-1990, new street layouts were the most connected.
Quantity of street network construction: The street network in Laghman spans a total of 371 kilometers. It is dominated by roads constructed in 2001-2014. These roads have an SNDi of 6.24, which is highly disconnected.
Effect on the aggregate network: New construction in each period adds to the total stock of streets, but does not change streets that have already been built. Therefore, it has a limited effect on the street network as a whole. The SNDis of the aggregate street network in the respective time periods are 6.65, 6.05, 5.15 and 5.73. The SNDi of the aggregate street network in fell at first, but Laghman has worsened in disconnectivity since 2000.
The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Laghman was at its lowest in 1976-1990. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Laghman, we can consider one of its most populous cities: Mihtarlam. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Mihtarlam followed a zig-zag trend.
How do development practices in Laghman fare in comparison to others in Afghanistan? Most recently in 2001-2014, street construction in Laghman was the 5th-most disconnected out of the 25 regions in Afghanistan. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Afghanistan, street construction in Laghman has become more disconnected. Laghman ranked 10th in 1975, 8th in 1976-1990, 11th in 1991-2000 and 5th in 2001-2014.
As of 2014, the city with the most disconnected street network in Laghman is Mihtarlam with an SNDi of 1.07, which is relatively well-connected. Conversely, the most connected city is Mihtarlam with an SNDi of 1.07, which is relatively well-connected. See trends for these cities: Mihtarlam, Mihtarlam
The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Laghman was at its lowest in 1991-2000. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Laghman, we can consider one of its most populous cities: Mihtarlam. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Mihtarlam followed a zig-zag trend.
To date, Laghman is the 8th-most disconnected out of the 25 regions in Afghanistan. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Afghanistan, the street network in Laghman has become more disconnected. Laghman ranked 10th in 1975, 10th in 1976-1990, 13th in 1991-2000 and 8th in 2001-2014.