The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Quảng Nam was at its lowest in 1991-2005. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Quảng Nam, we can consider two of its most populous cities: Tam Kỳ and Hội An. Out of the two cities, Hội An does not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Hội An followed a zig-zag trend with an overall decrease.

How do development practices in Quảng Nam fare in comparison to others in Vietnam? Most recently in 2006-2020, street construction in Quảng Nam was the 16th-most disconnected out of the 58 regions in Vietnam. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Vietnam, street construction in Quảng Nam has become more disconnected. Quảng Nam ranked 42nd in 1975, 40th in 1976-1990, 19th in 1991-2005 and 16th in 2006-2020.

As of 2020, the city with the most disconnected street network in Quảng Nam is Hội An with an SNDi of 4.16, which is sprawly. Conversely, the most connected city is Tam Kỳ with an SNDi of 3.08, which is moderately connected. See trends for these cities: Tam Kỳ, Hội An

The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Quảng Nam fell steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Quảng Nam, we can consider two of its most populous cities: Tam Kỳ and Hội An. Out of the two cities, Hội An does not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Hội An peaked in 1976-1990.

To date, Quảng Nam is the 27th-most disconnected out of the 58 regions in Vietnam. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Vietnam, the street network in Quảng Nam has become more disconnected. Quảng Nam ranked 42nd in 1975, 42nd in 1976-1990, 31st in 1991-2005 and 27th in 2006-2020.