Hazorasp in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Hazorasp in context

4567<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
4567<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
HazoraspXorazm (Region)Uzbekistan (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Hazorasp plotted against Xorazm and Uzbekistan. The SNDi of new construction in Hazorasp peaked in 1991-2005, compared to Xorazm which peaked in 1991-2005 and Uzbekistan which rose steadily. Most recently, Hazorasp's incremental SNDi fell from 7.2 to 5.74 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Hazorasp ranked 5th out of 5 cities in Xorazm and 68th out of 72 in Uzbekistan as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
5.74
Rank in Uzbekistan
59th of 72
Rank in Xorazm
5th of 5

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
6.05
Rank in Uzbekistan
68th of 72
Rank in Xorazm
5th of 5

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

246<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
246<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
HazoraspXinganOum El Bouaghi

In new street additions, Hazorasp built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved, while Xingan built increasingly disconnected streets over time and Oum El Bouaghi fluctuated in its street-construction patterns. For the full network, Hazorasp grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved, while Xingan became progressively more disconnected and Oum El Bouaghi grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved.