The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Namangan followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Namangan, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Namangan, Tergachi and Chust. Disconnectivity in the most populous cities in Namangan follow the same region trend.

How do development practices in Namangan fare in comparison to others in Uzbekistan? Most recently in 2006-2020, street construction in Namangan was the 9th-most disconnected out of the 14 regions in Uzbekistan. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Uzbekistan, street construction in Namangan has become more disconnected. Namangan ranked 11th in 1975, 7th in 1976-1990, 4th in 1991-2005 and 9th in 2006-2020.

As of 2020, the city with the most disconnected street network in Namangan is Namangan with an SNDi of 4.34, which is sprawly. Conversely, the most connected city is Chust with an SNDi of 2.92, which is moderately connected. See trends for these cities: Chust, Namangan

The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Namangan rose steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Namangan, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Namangan, Tergachi and Chust. Out of the three cities, Tergachi and Chust do not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Tergachi followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Chust followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase.

To date, Namangan is the 9th-most disconnected out of the 14 regions in Uzbekistan. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in Uzbekistan, the street network in Namangan has become more disconnected. Namangan ranked 11th in 1975, 9th in 1976-1990, 9th in 1991-2005 and 9th in 2006-2020.