The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Florida rose steadily. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Florida, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Miami, Orlando and Saint Petersburg. None of the most populous cities follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Miami peaked in 1991-2005. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Orlando peaked in 1991-2005. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Saint Petersburg peaked in 1976-1990.

How do development practices in Florida fare in comparison to others in United States? Most recently in 2006-2020, street construction in Florida was the 38th-most disconnected out of the 44 regions in United States. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in United States, street construction in Florida has become more disconnected. Florida ranked 40th in 1975, 31st in 1976-1990, 36th in 1991-2005 and 38th in 2006-2020.

As of 2020, the city with the most disconnected street network in Florida is Beechwood with an SNDi of 7.61, which is very sprawly. Conversely, the most connected city is Fort Pierce with an SNDi of 2.19, which is well-connected. See trends for these cities: Fort Pierce, Beechwood

The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Florida rose steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Florida, we can consider three of its most populous cities: Miami, Orlando and Saint Petersburg. Disconnectivity in the most populous cities in Florida follow the same region trend.

To date, Florida is the 35th-most disconnected out of the 44 regions in United States. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has risen; relative to other regions in United States, the street network in Florida has become more disconnected. Florida ranked 40th in 1975, 37th in 1976-1990, 35th in 1991-2005 and 35th in 2006-2020.