Pervomaisk in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Pervomaisk in context

2.533.54<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2.533.54<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
PervomaiskMykolayiv (Region)Ukraine (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Pervomaisk plotted against Mykolayiv and Ukraine. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Pervomaisk's incremental SNDi rose from 4.2 to 4.21 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Pervomaisk ranked 2nd out of 2 cities in Mykolayiv and 67th out of 75 in Ukraine as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
4.21
Rank in Ukraine
56th of 75
Rank in Mykolayiv
1st of 2

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
3.09
Rank in Ukraine
67th of 75
Rank in Mykolayiv
2nd of 2

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

2.433.64.2<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2.433.64.2<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
PervomaiskQingyangKomani

While Qingyang and Komani both built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved, Pervomaisk built increasingly disconnected streets over time in new street additions. For the full network, Pervomaisk and Komani both became progressively more disconnected, while Qingyang grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved. Pervomaisk and Qingyang have been growing further apart in their street-network character since 1975.