The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Kiev rose steadily. To get a sense of how street development has changed in Kiev, we can consider two of its most populous cities: Bila Tserkva and Brovary. Out of the two cities, Brovary does not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in new development in Brovary followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase.

How do development practices in Kiev fare in comparison to others in Ukraine? Most recently in 2006-2020, street construction in Kiev was the 13th-most disconnected out of the 27 regions in Ukraine. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other regions in Ukraine, street construction in Kiev has become more connected. Kiev ranked 12th in 1975, 16th in 1976-1990, 18th in 1991-2005 and 13th in 2006-2020.

As of 2020, the city with the most disconnected street network in Kiev is Bila Tserkva with an SNDi of 2.62, which is relatively well-connected. Conversely, the most connected city is Brovary with an SNDi of 2.35, which is well-connected. See trends for these cities: Brovary, Bila Tserkva

The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Kiev rose steadily. To get a sense of how the aggregate street network has changed in Kiev, we can consider two of its most populous cities: Bila Tserkva and Brovary. Out of the two cities, Brovary does not follow the same trend as the region. The level of street-network sprawl in the aggregate network in Brovary was at its lowest in 1976-1990.

To date, Kiev is the 18th-most disconnected out of the 27 regions in Ukraine. Its position in the ranks since 1975 has fallen; relative to other regions in Ukraine, the street network in Kiev has become more connected. Kiev ranked 12th in 1975, 17th in 1976-1990, 17th in 1991-2005 and 18th in 2006-2020.