Brovary in context: Street-network sprawl trends
Brovary in context
The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Brovary plotted against Kiev and Ukraine. The SNDi of new construction in Brovary followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, compared to Kiev which rose steadily and Ukraine which rose steadily. Most recently, Brovary's incremental SNDi fell from 3.16 to 2.51 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Brovary ranked 1st out of 2 cities in Kiev and 35th out of 75 in Ukraine as of 2020.
New Street Additions (2006–2020)
- SNDi value
- 2.51
- Rank in Ukraine
- 12th of 75
- Rank in Kiev
- 1st of 2
Entire Network (Aggregate)
- SNDi value
- 2.35
- Rank in Ukraine
- 35th of 75
- Rank in Kiev
- 1st of 2
Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.
What about similarly populated cities?
- Sóc Trăng, Vietnam
- Parakan, Indonesia
- Ujhani, India
- Kargilik, China
- Fort Collins, United States
- Gundo Meskel, Ethiopia
In new street additions, Brovary fluctuated in its street-construction patterns, while Sóc Trăng built increasingly disconnected streets over time and Kargilik fluctuated in its street-construction patterns. For the full network, Brovary became more connected from 1975 through 1976-1990, then grew more sprawly from 1976-1990 onwards, while Sóc Trăng became progressively more disconnected and Kargilik fluctuated in connectivity. Notably, Brovary had a more sprawly network than Sóc Trăng in 1975 but the two have since reversed their relative ranking.