Uman in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Uman in context

2.83.23.64<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2.83.23.64<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
UmanCherkasy (Region)Ukraine (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Uman plotted against Cherkasy and Ukraine. All three follow the same trend in new construction, suggesting a shared regional pattern of development. Most recently, Uman's incremental SNDi rose from 3.56 to 4.01 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Uman ranked 3rd out of 3 cities in Cherkasy and 68th out of 75 in Ukraine as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
4.01
Rank in Ukraine
49th of 75
Rank in Cherkasy
2nd of 3

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
3.1
Rank in Ukraine
68th of 75
Rank in Cherkasy
3rd of 3

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
UmanHoylandNzagi

While Hoyland and Nzagi both built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved, Uman built increasingly disconnected streets over time in new street additions. For the full network, Uman and Nzagi both became progressively more disconnected, while Hoyland grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved. Uman and Nzagi have been converging in their street-network character since 1975.