Proletar in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Proletar in context

456<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
456<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
ProletarSughd (Region)Tajikistan (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Proletar plotted against Sughd and Tajikistan. The SNDi of new construction in Proletar peaked in 1991-2005, compared to Sughd which rose steadily and Tajikistan which followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Proletar's incremental SNDi fell from 4.81 to 3.39 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Proletar ranked 4th out of 8 cities in Sughd and 7th out of 22 in Tajikistan as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
3.39
Rank in Tajikistan
2nd of 22
Rank in Sughd
2nd of 8

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
3.81
Rank in Tajikistan
7th of 22
Rank in Sughd
4th of 8

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

12345<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
12345<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
ProletarGuanhuHamm

Proletar, Guanhu, and Hamm all built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved in new street construction. For the full network, Proletar and Hamm both became progressively more disconnected, while Guanhu fluctuated in connectivity. Proletar and Guanhu have been converging in their street-network character since 1975.