Shahrinav in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Shahrinav in context

4.55.46.37.2<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
4.55.46.37.2<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
ShahrinavDistricts of Republican Subordin (Region)Tajikistan (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Shahrinav plotted against Districts of Republican Subordin and Tajikistan. While Districts of Republican Subordin and Tajikistan both followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase, Shahrinav's new street additions followed a zig-zag trend with an overall increase. Most recently, Shahrinav's incremental SNDi rose from 6.29 to 7.49 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Shahrinav ranked 3rd out of 4 cities in Districts of Republican Subordin and 21st out of 22 in Tajikistan as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
7.49
Rank in Tajikistan
17th of 22
Rank in Districts of Republican Subordin
3rd of 4

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
6.06
Rank in Tajikistan
21st of 22
Rank in Districts of Republican Subordin
3rd of 4

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

2468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
ShahrinavSanoDunfermline

While Sano and Dunfermline both built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved, Shahrinav fluctuated in its street-construction patterns in new street additions. For the full network, Shahrinav and Sano both became progressively more disconnected, while Dunfermline grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved.