Colombo [Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte] in context: Street-network sprawl trends

Colombo [Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte] in context

45678<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
45678<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
Colombo [Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte]Gampaha (Region)Sri Lanka (Country)

The chart above shows SNDi trends for new street additions (left panel) and the entire network (right panel), with Colombo [Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte] plotted against Gampaha and Sri Lanka. While Gampaha and Sri Lanka both rose steadily, Colombo [Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte]'s new street additions rose steadily. Most recently, Colombo [Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte]'s incremental SNDi rose from 6.71 to 7.68 between 1991-2005 and 2006-2020. In terms of the aggregate network, Colombo [Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte] ranked 1st out of 1 cities in Gampaha and 17th out of 21 in Sri Lanka as of 2020.

New Street Additions (2006–2020)

SNDi value
7.68
Rank in Sri Lanka
18th of 21
Rank in Gampaha
1st of 1

Entire Network (Aggregate)

SNDi value
6.11
Rank in Sri Lanka
17th of 21
Rank in Gampaha
1st of 1

Rankings go from most connected to most disconnected — rank 1 is the most connected.

What about similarly populated cities?

2468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of street additions
2468<19751976–19901991–20052006–2020SNDi of entire street network
Colombo [Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte]ZhengzhouHefei

In new street additions, Colombo [Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte] built increasingly disconnected streets over time, while Zhengzhou built increasingly disconnected streets from 1975 through 1976-1990, then improved and Hefei fluctuated in its street-construction patterns. For the full network, Colombo [Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte] and Hefei both became progressively more disconnected, while Zhengzhou grew more disconnected from 1975 through 1991-2005, then improved. Colombo [Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte] and Zhengzhou have been growing further apart in their street-network character since 1975.